Management and Business
e-ISSN 3041-2420 | UDC 33
|
EN
Submit an article →
← Vol. 3, No. 1, 2025

Network planning methods in project management: Overview of software products

Svitlana Loza ORCID
National University “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic”

Abstract

Ukraine is experiencing challenging economic instability that is affecting various economic sectors. Due to military actions and infrastructure destruction, there is an urgent need for rapid and effective reconstruction. Network planning methods help optimise resources and minimise costs, which is particularly relevant in conditions of limited funding. These methods enable the coordination of numerous projects, ensure their timely completion, and contribute to better synchronization between different project stages, reducing the likelihood of errors and delays. This study aimed to analyse network planning methods in project management, examine their key advantages and disadvantages, and justify the feasibility of using different project management software in conditions of economic instability and uncertainty. The article presented an analysis of two primary network planning methods – Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM). A network diagram for the reconstruction of a production unit was developed. It has been proven that precise planning, resource optimisation, and effective risk management enhance the overall efficiency of project implementation, which is crucial for improving the competitiveness of Ukrainian enterprises. The study confirmed that the relevance of PERT and CPM in modern project management is due to their ability to ensure efficient planning, control, and resource management. The development of information technologies has opened new opportunities for the implementation of automated project management systems. It has been established that network planning methods can be easily integrated with modern software solutions, thereby increasing project management efficiency. An overview of key project management tools was conducted, and their applicability for network diagram construction was examined. The use of network planning methods in Ukraine is essential for effective project management, resource optimization, and enhancing the country’s competitiveness

Keywords:
network diagram; Gantt chart; critical path method; program evaluation and review technique; optimisation

References

  1. Akpan, N.P., & Agadaga, G.O. (2020). Modelling building renovation using PERT. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 16(4), 25-38. doi: 10.9734/arjom/2020/v16i430184.
  2. Asana. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://asana.com.
  3. Ba’Its, H.A., Arum Puspita, I., & Bay, A.F. (2020). Combination of Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM) for project schedule development. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 12(3), 68-75. doi: 10.30880/ijie.2020.12.03.009.
  4. Batenko, L., Liezina, A., & Moskaliuk, V. (2020). Provision of maturity of project management: Methodical approaches and practical implementation. Economic Analysis, 30 (1(1)), 22-37. doi: 10.35774/econa2020.01.01.022.
  5. Blyznyukova, I., Semko, I., & Kiyko, S. (2020). Overview of modern team management methodologies IT projects. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 43, 60-66. doi: 10.32347/2412-9933.2020.43.60-66.
  6. Bokovets, V.V., & Zaiats, O.M. (2022). Modern project management methods and their features. Market Infrastructure, 65, 55-57. doi: 10.32843/infrastruct65-9.
  7. Cabeças, A. (2022). Evolution of project management in the digital economy. TECHNO Review, 11(2), 303-316. doi: 10.37467/gkarevtechno.v11.3233.
  8. Cabeças, A., & Marques da Silva, M. (2021) Project management in the fourth industrial revolution. TECHNO Review, 9(2), 79-96. doi: 10.37467/gka-revtechno.v9.2804.
  9. GanttProject. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ganttproject.biz.
  10. Hlushenkova, A.A. (2024). Managing innovative projects in the context of digital transformation. Economics. Management. Business, 2(45). 56-61. doi: 10.31673/2415-8089.2024.010707.
  11. Jira. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira.
  12. Kelley, J.E., Walker, M.R., & Sayer, J.S. (1989). The origins of CPM: A personal history. PM Network, 3(2), 7-22.
  13. Khrapkin, O., Kindrat, O., & Chopey, R. (2023). Project management in the IT industry: Methods, tools and risk management. Economy and Society, 55. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-110
  14. Lee, S., & Shvetsova, O.A. (2019). Optimization of the technology transfer process using Gantt charts and critical path analysis flow diagrams: Case study of the Korean automobile industry. Processes, 7(12), article number 917. doi: 10.3390/pr7120917.
  15. Martyniak, I., & Bakushevych, I. (2024). Hybrid project management models in the conditions of sustainable development and digital economy. Sustainable Development of Economy, 3(50), 21-26. doi: 10.32782/2308-1988/2024-50-4.
  16. Microsoft Project. (n.d.). Retrieved https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/project/project-management-software.
  17. Novak, Y., Sobko, Y., & Sumariuk, O. (2023). Feasibility of using the Gantt chart for the development of project documentation. Current Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, 65, 291-300. doi: 10.32347/2077-3455.2023.65.291-300.
  18. Olkhovskyi, D., Olkhovska, O., Oleksiichuk, Y., Orikhivska, O., & Rudenko, N. (2023). IT project management: opportunities and software analysis. Information Technology: Computer Science, Software Engineering and Cyber Security, 3, 60-64. doi: 10.32782/IT/2023-3-7.
  19. OpenProject. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.openproject.org.
  20. Panas, Y. (2024). Information support for the management of innovative projects in the digital economy. Economy and Society, 62. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2024-62-119.
  21. Pilyukov, A. (2024). Comparative analysis of the methodological and categorical apparatus of project management. The Ukrainian Economic Journal, 5, 100-106. doi: 10.32782/2786-8273/2024-5-18.
  22. Primavera P6. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.oracle.com.
  23. Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (7th ed.). (2021). Upper Darby: Project Management Institute.
  24. ProjectLibre. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.projectlibre.com.
  25. Redmine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.redmine.org.
  26. Rodashchuk, H.Yu., Kontseba, S.M., Lishchuk, R.І., & Skurtol, S.D. (2023). Network planning in IT project management. Таuridа Scientific Herald. Series: Technical Sciences, (1), 42-56. doi: 10.32851/tnv-tech.2023.1.5.
  27. Slabinoha, M., & Mykhailov, T. (2023). Using expert judgement techniques to estimate it projects completion time. Information Technology and Society, 2(8), 79-83. doi: 10.32689/maup.it.2023.2.9.
  28. Smartsheet. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.smartsheet.com/.
  29. TaskJuggler. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://taskjuggler.org.
  30. Vagonova, O., Tiutchenko, S., Ashcheulova, O., & Romaniuk, N. (2024). Modern approaches to the management of business process optimization projects of commercial enterprises. Efficient Economy, 9. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105.2024.9.10.
  31. Watt, A. (2014). Project management (2nd ed.). Victoria: BCcampus.
  32. Zasukha, I.P. (2021). Public sector digitalization project management. (PhD thesis, National University of Building and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  33. Zhygalkevych, Z., & Chuhlib, V. (2019). Project and risk management: Approaches and methods. Pryazovskyi Economic Herald, 6(17), 126-130. doi: 10.32840/2522-4263/2019-6-24.

Suggested citation

Loza, L. (2025). Network planning methods in project management: Overview of software products. Management and Business, 3(1), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.59214/mb/1.2025.06