Management and Business
e-ISSN 3041-2420 | UDC 33
|
EN
Submit an article →
← Vol. 3, No. 1, 2025

Innovations in the field of urban transport on the example of electric bus programmes in France and the Netherlands

Aldi Mucka ORCID
Polytechnic University of Tirana

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to find out the economic and environmental feasibility of implementing electric bus programmes in France and the Netherlands considering their impact on municipal budgets, environmental indicators, and social development. The analysis of financial indicators, the cost structure of total cost of ownership, and socio-environmental effects found that the payback period for investments averaged 8-10 years in France and 6-8 years in the Netherlands due to different levels of regulatory requirements and the development of charging infrastructure. The cost structure showed that the share of purchases of electric buses was 45% versus 30% for diesel buses, while energy and maintenance costs were lower (35% vs. 55%, respectively). In France, energy costs for electric buses were 0.18-0.22 EUR/km versus 0.35-0.40 EUR/km for diesel buses, and maintenance costs were 0.12-0.15 EUR/km versus 0.18-0.22 EUR/km; in the Netherlands, the difference was smaller, but remained in favour of electric buses. The environmental impact was determined by reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 900-1,100 tonnes per year per 100 buses in France and 800-1,000 tonnes in the Netherlands. Social results included an 8-12% increase in passenger traffic in French agglomerations and 6-10% in Dutch medium and small cities, the creation of 5-7 thousand jobs in France and 3-5 thousand in the Netherlands, and the development of innovative sectors – battery technologies in France and digital services in the Netherlands. It has been proven that a centralised financing model in France provides stability, while a decentralised concession system in the Netherlands promotes faster adaptation and competition between carriers. The practical significance of the study was to determine the conditions of economic feasibility and socio-environmental benefits of electric bus programmes, the results of which can be used by authorities, municipalities, and transport operators to improve sustainable transport strategies and investment planning

Keywords:
municipal budgets; total cost of ownership; energy; maintenance; depreciation; payback period; regulatory requirements

References

  1. Adamczyk, J., Dzikuć, M., Dylewski, R., & Varese, E. (2024). Assessment of selected environmental and economic factors for the development of electro-mobility in Poland. Transportation, 51(6), 2199-2223. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10402-3.
  2. Alarrouqi, R.A., Ahmad, F., Bayhan, S., & Al-Fagih, L. (2024). Electric buses in hot climates: Challenges, technologies, and the road ahead. IEEE Access, 12, article number 55531-55550. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3387542.
  3. Aldenius, M., Mullen, C., & Pettersson-Löfstedt, F. (2022). Electric buses in England and Sweden-Overcoming barriers to introduction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 104, article number 103204. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103204.
  4. Alotaibi, S., Quddus, M., Morton, C., & Imprialou, M. (2022). Transport investment, railway accessibility and their dynamic impacts on regional economic growth. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, article number 100702. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100702.
  5. Bastos, P., Andrade, V., & Consoni, F. (2024). Greening Latin American public transit: The role and approaches of international cooperation networks for e-bus adoption. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4769013.
  6. Borysova, T., Monastyrskyi, G., Borysiak, O., & Protsyshyn, Y. (2021). Priorities of marketing, competitiveness, and innovative development of transport service providers under sustainable urban development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 78-89. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2021.3-07.
  7. Brehm, P.A., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The efficiency and environmental impacts of market organization: Evidence from the Texas electricity market. Energy Economics, 101, article number 105359. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105359.
  8. Chattopadhyay, D., & Foster, V. (2025). Distinctive regulatory challenges in developing countries. In Handbook on electricity regulation (pp. 504-533). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781035314355.00029.
  9. Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council “On the Promotion of Clean and Energy-Efficient Road Transport Vehicles”. (2009, April). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0033.
  10. Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council “On the Deployment of Alternative Fuels Infrastructure”. (2014, October). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0094.
  11. Dutch Municipalities Association (VNG). (n.d.). Zero-emission zones in the Netherlands. The Hague: Netherlands Enterprise Agency RVO.
  12. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM/2019/640 final). Brussels: European Commission.
    European Commission. (2023). New EU rules on zero-emission buses. Brussels: European Commission.
  13. European Environment Agency. (2025a). Transport and environment reporting mechanism (TERM): Air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from transport. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/msdee55k.
  14. European Environment Agency. (2025b). Transport and mobility. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/transport-and-mobility.
  15. European Investment Bank. (2025a). Financing cleaner transport: Annual impact report 2024. Luxembourg: EIB.
  16. European Investment Bank. (2025b). EIB Group Climate Bank Roadmap 2021-2025: Evaluation report. Luxembourg: EIB.
  17. Foster, V., Gorgulu, N., Straub, S., & Vagliasindi, M. (2023). The impact of infrastructure on development outcomes. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  18. French Republic. (2024). Greening of the vehicle fleet. Retrieved from https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/verdissement-du-parc-automobile.
  19. French Republic. (2025). Mandatory infrastructure for charging electric vehicles. Retrieved from https://entreprendre.service-public.fr/vosdroits/F38491.
  20. Galatoire, E.A.D., Núñez-Hernández, F., & Arcos-Vargas, Á. (2024). A sustainable electricity market design: Application to the Iberian market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 480, article number 144032. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144032.
  21. Government of the Netherlands. (n.d.). Draft legislation to implement Renewable Energy Directive III (RED III) targets in the transport sector. The Hague: Government of the Netherlands.
  22. Haywood, L., & Jakob, M. (2023). The role of the emissions trading scheme 2 in the policy mix to decarbonize road transport in the European Union. Transport Policy, 139, 99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.06.003.
  23. Hensher, D.A. (2021). The case for negotiated contracts under the transition to a green bus fleet. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 154, 255-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.006.
  24. Hosseinkhani, N.T. (2025). Comprehensive analysis of tariff effects on the United States economy. Retrieved from http://131.204.73.195/handle/11200/50709.
  25. Île-de-France Mobilités. (2025). The Point du Jour bus operational centre switches to electric. Paris: Île-de-France Mobilités.
  26. International Energy Agency. (2025). Energy prices and statistics database. Paris: IEA.
  27. Kostenko, G.P., Zgurovets, O.V., & Tovstenko, M.M. (2023). SWOT analysis of electric transport and V2G implementation for power system sustainable development in the terms of Ukraine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1254(1), article number 012030. doi 10.1088/1755-1315/1254/1/012030.
  28. Kraciuk, J., Kacperska, E., Łukasiewicz, K., & Pietrzak, P. (2022). Innovative energy technologies in road transport in selected EU countries. Energies, 15(16), article number 6030. doi: 10.3390/en15166030.
  29. Kryshtal, H., Tomakh, V., Ivanova, T., Metelytsia, V., Yermolaieva, M., & Panin, Y. (2024). Eco-innovative transformation of the urban infrastructure of Ukraine on the way to post-war recovery. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(55), 391-408. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.2.55.2024.4281.
  30. Law of France No. 2015-992 “On Energy Transition for Green Growth”. (2015, August). Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000031044385.
  31. Law of France No. 2019-1428 “On the Orientation of Mobility (LOM)”. (2019, December). Retrieved from https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/loi-dorientation-des-mobilites.
  32. Law of France No. 2021-1104 “On Combating Climate Change and Strengthening Resilience to Its Effects (Climate and Resilience Law)”. (2021, August). Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000043956924.
  33. Macioszek, E. (2021). The role of incentive programs in promoting the purchase of electric cars–review of good practices and promoting methods from the world. In Research methods in modern urban transportation systems and networks (pp. 41-58). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-71708-7_4.
  34. Minami, S. (2021). Local government and innovation for sustainable mobility. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-03184346/.
  35. Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. (2016). Voluntary agreement on zero emission bus transport. The Hague: Government of the Netherlands.
  36. Miraftabzadeh, S.M., Ranjgar, B., Niccolai, A., & Longo, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of sustainable electrification in mediterranean public transportation. Sustainability, 16(7), article number 2645. doi: 10.3390/su16072645.
  37. Mopidevi, S., Narasipuram, R.P., Aemalla, S.R., & Rajan, H. (2022). E-mobility: Impacts and analysis of future transportation electrification market in economic, renewable energy and infrastructure perspective. International Journal of Powertrains, 11(2-3), 264-284. doi: 10.1504/IJPT.2022.124752.
  38. Motowidlak, U., & Bukowska-Piestrzyńska, A. (2024). Determinants of electromobility development from the perspective of a zero emission, innovative and resilient economy. Economics and Environment, 1, article number 732. doi: 10.34659/eis.2024.88.1.732.
  39. Ogunkunbi, G.A., Al-Zibaree, H.K.Y., & Meszaros, F. (2021). Evidence-based market overview of incentives and disincentives in electric mobility as a key to the sustainable future. Future Transportation, 1(02), 290-302. doi: 10.3390/futuretransp1020017.
  40. Patel, A.R., Tesoriere, G., & Campisi, T. (2022). Users’ socio-economic factors to choose electromobility for future smart cities. In International conference on computational science and its applications (pp. 331-344). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-10542-5_23.
  41. Pohuda, N., Ivchenko, L., & Pohuda, O. (2024). Methodological approaches to the functioning of the passenger transportation market: Airline, road and railway segments. Development Management, 23(3), 60-71. doi: 10.57111/devt/3.2024.60.
  42. Pollák, F., Vodák, J., Soviar, J., Markovič, P., Lentini, G., Mazzeschi, V., & Luè, A. (2021). Promotion of electric mobility in the European Union – overview of project PROMETEUS from the perspective of cohesion through synergistic cooperation on the example of the catching-up region. Sustainability, 13(3), article number 1545. doi: 10.3390/su13031545.
  43. Połom, M. (2021). E-revolution in post-communist country? A critical review of electric public transport development in Poland. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, article number 102227. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102227.
  44. Ruggieri, R., Ruggeri, M., Vinci, G., & Poponi, S. (2021). Electric mobility in a smart city: European overview. Energies, 14(2), article number 315. doi: 10.3390/en14020315.
  45. Stepniak, M., Gkoumas, K., Marques, D., Grosso, M., & Pekar, F. (2022). Public transport research and innovation in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/18036.
  46. Utomo, D.T., & Dianita, C. (2025). Scenario-based evaluation of economic feasibility and risk in city gas networks: A case study from East Java, Indonesia. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(2), 139-147. doi: 10.29017/scog.v48i2.1766.
  47. Vakulenko, K., Burko, D., Lynnyk, I., Sokolova, N., & Kush, Y. (2024). Sustainable development of Ukrainian cities: Inclusiveness of urban passenger transport services and environmental impact. In International scientific conference intelligent transport systems: Ecology, safety, quality, comfort (pp. 63-73). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-87376-8_6.
  48. Wang, C., Wang, D., Abbas, J., Duan, K., & Mubeen, R. (2021). Global financial crisis, smart lockdown strategies, and the COVID-19 spillover impacts: A global perspective implications from Southeast Asia. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, article number 643783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643783.
  49. Yánez, A.H., González, C.F., & Moreira, K. (2024). Brief review on the implementation of charging stations for electric buses. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1434(1), article number 012014. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1434/1/012014.

Suggested citation

Mucka, A. (2025). Innovations in the field of urban transport on the example of electric bus programmes in France and the Netherlands. Management and Business, 3(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.59214/mb/1.2025.58