Abstract
The Ukrainian people faced the greatest tragedy of the 21st century – a full-scale military attack by the Russian Federation on independent Ukraine, which had already been in a state of hybrid war with Russia for eight years. Over the years, the field of social work has also undergone significant changes, modernization and reform: developed models of social work with new vulnerable categories of the population - forced migrants; a network of social service centers for servicemen and their families was created; the regulatory and legal framework for providing social assistance to both vulnerable categories of the population and participants in hostilities has been improved; a management model of social work and a system of providing social services at the level of territorial communities in the context of the decentralization reform, etc., was initiated and implemented. But on February 24, 2022, the full-scale armed attack of the Russian Federation on Ukraine also affected the functioning of the sphere of social protection of the population, mobilizing the resource potential of the system of social work and social services and reformatting the priorities of providing social assistance and social services, and the Decree of the President of Ukraine "On the introduction of martial law in Ukraine » actualized the need for the formation of an effective model of social work in the conditions of martial law. One of the modern and effective conceptual approaches to practical social work in emergency situations and martial law is the "resilience" approach, the essence of which is the formation of resilience, adaptability to stressful situations, the ability to recover from mental and psychological trauma at the level of the individual, family and communityThe article examines the realities of managing the social work system under martial law in Ukraine. Management of social work consists primarily in the organization of the system of providing social services, which in the Law of Ukraine "On Social Services" are divided into services aimed at: 1) social prevention - preventing the occurrence of difficult life circumstances and/or a person/family falling into such circumstances ; 2) social support – helping a person/family overcome difficult life circumstances; 3) social service – minimization of the negative consequences of difficult life circumstances for the person/family, support of their life activities, social status and inclusion in the community
Keywords:
References
[1] Voronkova, V., et al. (2016). Public management and administration in the conditions of information society: Domestic and foreign experience. In Scientific publications of the Department of Management and Administration. Zaporizhzhya: ZDIA.
[2] Hretsa, S.M. (2014). Theoretical aspects of defining the concept of value added tax administration, Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University, 8, 74-76.
[3] Husak, N. (2015). Case management of internally displaced persons. Kyiv: UNDP.
[4] Isachenko, V., & Honchar, I. (2018). Case management in social work: current methods and features of documentation. Scientific Notes, 167, 50-54.
[5] The IASC guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in an emergency situation. (2017). Kyiv: PULSARS.
[6] Leshchynskyi, O.P. (2021). Methodology of social work management. In Proceedings of the I International scientific and practical conference (pp. 21-22). Chernihiv: National University of Chernihiv Polytechnic.
[7] Sabat, N. (2010). Models of social and pedagogical help to the unfortunate family. Visnyk of the Lviv University, 26. (158-165). doi: 10.30970/vpe.2010.26.4951.
[8] Savchuk, O.M., & Halai, A.O. (2016). Case management in work with internally displaced persons. Scientific Notes of NaUKMA. 188, 70-72.
[9] Semyhina, T. (2020). Modern social work. Kyiv: Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism.
[10] Semyhina, T., & Lykhovyd, D. (2015). Models and forms of civic engagement in local communities. New Paradigm. 128, 171-177.
[11] Semyhina, T. (2015). Social support of internally displaced persons. Ukrainian Society, 2(53), 65-72. doi: 10.15407/socium2015.02.065.
[12] Slozanska, Н.I. (2019). Theory and practice of future social workers training for the work in territorial communities. (Doctoral Dissertation, Ternopil V. Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine).
[13] Barker, R. (2003). The social work dictionary (5th ed.). Washington: NAWS Press.
[14] Strengths-based versus deficit-based approaches. (2011). Retrieved from https://fromhungertohealth.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/strengthsvsdeficitrb.pdf.
[15] Connor, K.M., & Davidson, J.R.T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 71-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
[16] Courtney, M.E., Piliavin, I., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Nesmith, A. (2001). Foster youth transitions to adulthood: A longitudinal view of youth leaving care. Child Welfare, 80(6), 685- 717.
[17] Cox, D., & Pawar, М. (2006). International social work: Issues, strategies, and programs. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781544308685.
[18] Gould, N., & Taylor, I. (1996). Reflective learning for social work: Research, theory and practice. London: Routledge.
[19] Levitt, J. (2017). Developing a model of disability that focuses on the actions of disabled people. Disability & Society. 32(5), 735-747. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1324764.
[20] Lovelock, R., Lyons, K., & Powel, J. (2017). Reflecting on social work – Discipline and profession. London: Routledge.
[21] Pattoni, L. (2012). Strengths-based approaches for working with individuals. Retrieved from https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/strengths-based-approaches-working-individuals.
[22] Ramon, S., & Maglajlic, R.A. (2012). Social work, political conflict and displacement. London: SAGE.
[23] Rothman, J., Erlich, J.L., & Tropman, J.E. (Eds.). (1995). Strategies of community intervention. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 23(3).
[24] Saleebey, D. (2006). The strengths approach to practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[25] Lai, K., Toliashvili, B. (2010). Community-based Programme for War-affected Children: the Case of Georgia. Social Work and Social Policy in Transition, 1(2), 92-118.