Abstract
It is noted that in each of the countries of the world community, specific forms of economic life organization have developed, in which both the general laws of the corresponding type of economy (planned, market, transitional, etc.) and the specifics of their specific historical implementation have manifested. The fundamental unity in the development of the economy of one type or another is based on its characteristic forms of ownership at the cost of production, the role of the state in the management of production and distribution, on the corresponding systems of social and economic values and orientation. Existing differences in specific forms and methods of management are related to the specifics of the economic development of countries, the ratio of extensive and intensive growth factors, the complexity and dynamism of the economy, the training of personnel, the established traditions of management, the degree of inclusion in the international division of labor, etc. The signs of the empirical description of economic systems are highlighted: - the system of property relations (the degree of its acquisition, forms of public ownership, the method of combining the worker with the means of production, the role and maintenance of private property, 12 «Підприємництво та управління розвитком соціально-економічних систем» № 1 / 2023 etc.); - the hierarchical structure of the economy (the role and place of the state in managing the economy, the nature of relationships between levels of management, organizational forms of management, etc.); - forms of economic and state regulation of the economic process, the level of ensuring its self-regulation, the degree of economic independence of the main production link. The proposed empirical method of comparative analysis has two sides: substantive and procedural. In terms of content, the main methodological task is to highlight the multifaceted activities that are typical for a given historically specific economic system (this is primarily institutional forms of activity, basic economic legal and economic standards and norms, stereotypes of economic behavior). The comparative analysis procedure consists in grouping and summarizing the main empirical data reflecting the content of the compared economic systems. At the heart of this procedure is the typology of economic systems, the meaning of which is to distinguish groups of the same type and distinguish on this basis two types of comparative analysis: inter-type and intra-type (that is, comparing objects of different or the same type, respectively)
Keywords:
References
[1] Liutyi, I.O. (2008). The market of debt securities in Ukraine: Controversies and trends. Kyiv: Centre of educational literature.
[2] Recunenko, I. (2015). Periodisation of the development of the Ukrainian stock market. Bulletin of Sumy State University, 1, 30-42.
[3] Yashchuk, V. (2011). Formation and development prospects of the Ukrainian stock market. Bulletin of KNTEU, 6(80), 46-55.
[4] Kutuzova, M. (2015). Problems of formation and regulation of the stock market of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University, 750, 107-111.
[5] Krasnovа, I.V. (2014). The stock market in Ukraine: The state and prospects of development. Problems of the Economy, 1, 129-134.
[6] Kovalova, O.M. (2016). Institutional aspects of the development of the stock market in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the Kherson State University, 16 (1), 124-127.
[7] Dehtiareva, O.I. (2014). Exchange business. Moscow: Master.
[8] Burmaka, M.O. (1998). Stock Market Regulation in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 78-83.
[9] Melnyk, V.A. (1998). Market of securities. Kyiv: VIRA-R.