Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of mentality, which, despite the presence of significant achievements of world and domestic science in understanding its essential features, continues to retain many debatable points. Recently, the increased interest in this problem was caused by serious political confrontational processes in the world, in particular the Russian-Ukrainian war, which actualized the search for deep ethno-psycho-social mechanisms that underlie the expansionist racist policy and the armed resistance of the Ukrainian people for the preservation of their own statehood and national identity. Such a role of mentality forces us to turn once again to the nature of various manifestations of this phenomenon, taking into account the achievements of modern ethnosocial and ethno-psychological research of science. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to outline the most general boundaries of the problem field of the phenomenon of mentality. The task is to determine the key aspects of the mentality problem that can be transfered into the practical plane
Keywords:
References
[1] Vlasevych, T. (2011). Mentality as the initial dimension of the folk worldview. Visnuk of the Lviv University, 1, 56-65.
[2] Hordiichuk, O. (2019). Genesis of the category of mentality in socio-philosophical discourse. Visnuk of the Lviv University, 23, 26-34. doi: 10.30970/2078-6999-2019-23-4.
[3] Humilev, L.N. (1990). The geography of ethnicity in the historical period. Leningrad: Nauka.
[4] Danyliuk, I.V. (2012). Problematic field of ethnic psychology as a science. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 3, 7-10.
[5] Danyliuk, I.V., & Hresko, V.V. (2017). Mentality as a leading ethnopsychological characteristic. Odesa National University herald, 22(1), 68-78.
[6] Dodonov, R.A. (1997). To the problem of defining the concept of mentality. Prydniprovskyi Scientific Bulletin, 14(25), 11-14.
[7] Koval, I.M. (2018). Metaanthropology of mentality: Legal dimension. (Doctoral dissertation, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine).
[8] Kozlovskii, V.V. (1997). The concept of mentality in sociological perspective. Sociology and Social Anthropology, 32-43.
[9] Kulchytskyi, O. (1995). Characteristics of the Ukrainian people. In Encyclopedia of Ukrainian Studies. General section (pp. 708-718). Kyiv: Heneza.
[10] Lozova, O.M. (2007). Structure and semantics of ethnic consciousness. Research Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Politechnic Institute”, 1(19), 83-87.
[11] Mentality. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
[12] Hrabovska, I.M., & Hrabovskyi, S.I. (2018). Mentality. Retrieved from https://esu.com.ua/article-66534.
[13] Boiko, O.D. (2020). National mentality. Retrieved from https://esu.com.ua/article-71042.
[14] Petinova, O.B. (2004). Mentality as a socio-cultural phenomenon in the context of socio-philosophical analysis. Culture of the Black Sea peoples, 48(1), 138-143.
[15] Polishchuk, I.O. (2017). The concept of national mentality. Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2, 105-113.
[16] Rozov, N. (2011). Modern Russian mentality: Diversity of habitus and directions of change. Retrieved from http://razdatok.narod.ru/users/pages/s077/p077.htm.
[17] Savytska, O.V., & Spivak, L.M. (2011). Ethnopsychology. Kyiv: Karavela.
[18] Uvarova, T.I. (2012). Terminological problems of the category of mentality in culturology. Scientific Notes, 9, 3-13.
[19] Yung, K.G. (2018). Archetypes and the collective unconscious. Lviv: The Astrolabe Publishing Ltd.